Quashing of tax-evasion and forgery allegations refused where disputed facts required evidence at trial.

Allegations of fabricated account books, false entries, concealment of income, and tax evasion under the Income-tax Act and the IPC were held to require evidentiary examination, so they could not be decided in a quashing proceeding at the threshold. The Court noted that the prescribed punishment made the matter triable under warrant procedure, and the accused could raise all available defences at trial. On that basis, the request to quash the criminal proceedings was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the criminal proceedings alleging offences under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the Indian Penal Code, 1860 should be quashed at the threshold.

Analysis: The allegations concerned fabrication of account books, false entries, concealment of income, and evasion of tax. Such matters required evidence and could not be adjudicated in a quashing proceeding. The Court also noted that, having regard to the punishment prescribed, the case was triable with warrant procedure and the petitioner would have an opportunity to raise all available defences during trial.

Conclusion: The request to quash the proceedings was rejected.

---