TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appeal lies against an order dismissing an application for review.
Analysis: The challenge before the Court was confined to the order passed in review. The governing principle applied was that an appeal does not lie against an order rejecting review, as Order 47 Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 bars such an appeal. The Court followed the settled position that the proper subject of challenge is the original order and not the order refusing review.
Conclusion: An appeal against the order dismissing the review application was not maintainable, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: An order rejecting review is not appealable where the procedural bar under Order 47 Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 applies.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
