<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 644 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178126</link>
    <description>An appeal does not lie against an order rejecting review where Order 47 Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 bars such a challenge. The proper subject of appeal is the original order, not the order refusing review. The Supreme Court applied this settled procedural principle to hold that the challenge confined to the dismissal of the review application was not maintainable, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 17:27:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=414546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 644 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178126</link>
      <description>An appeal does not lie against an order rejecting review where Order 47 Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 bars such a challenge. The proper subject of appeal is the original order, not the order refusing review. The Supreme Court applied this settled procedural principle to hold that the challenge confined to the dismissal of the review application was not maintainable, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>