TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disciplinary committee of the Bar Council of India, hearing an appeal under Section 37 of the Advocates Act, 1961, had jurisdiction to interfere with the State Bar Council's order and remand charge No. 3 for fresh reasons, even though the appeal was filed by the advocate and no separate appeal had been filed against his exoneration on that charge.
Analysis: The appellate power conferred by Section 37(2) is of the widest amplitude and authorises the disciplinary committee of the Bar Council of India to pass such order as it deems fit. That power must, however, be exercised consistently with the scheme and purpose of the Advocates Act, 1961, which treats disciplinary proceedings as matters concerning the legal profession as a whole and not as a private lis between complainant and advocate. The statutory framework, including the supervisory role of the Bar Council of India and the disciplinary structure under Sections 35, 36, 37 and 38, shows that the appellate body is not confined by technical rules applicable to criminal appeals or by the doctrine of autrefois acquit. In that setting, a remand for proper reasons on a charge not satisfactorily dealt with was within jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The remand order was within jurisdiction and was valid.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
