<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 303 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175775</link>
    <description>Section 37(2) of the Advocates Act confers a wide appellate power on the Bar Council of India&#039;s disciplinary committee to pass such order as it deems fit, but that power must be exercised within the Act&#039;s disciplinary scheme. In disciplinary matters under Sections 35, 36, 37 and 38, the process concerns the legal profession as a whole and is not a private dispute between complainant and advocate. On that basis, the committee was not confined by technical criminal-appellate principles or autrefois acquit, and it could remand a charge for fresh reasons where the State Bar Council had not dealt with it satisfactorily. The remand was held to be within jurisdiction and valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 303 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175775</link>
      <description>Section 37(2) of the Advocates Act confers a wide appellate power on the Bar Council of India&#039;s disciplinary committee to pass such order as it deems fit, but that power must be exercised within the Act&#039;s disciplinary scheme. In disciplinary matters under Sections 35, 36, 37 and 38, the process concerns the legal profession as a whole and is not a private dispute between complainant and advocate. On that basis, the committee was not confined by technical criminal-appellate principles or autrefois acquit, and it could remand a charge for fresh reasons where the State Bar Council had not dealt with it satisfactorily. The remand was held to be within jurisdiction and valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>