Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in the case with citation 2007 (11) TMI 598 - SC.</h1> <h3>Commissioner Versus Vardhman Industries Ltd.</h3> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in the case with citation 2007 (11) TMI 598 - SC. - Commissioner Versus Vardhman Industries Ltd. - 2011 (267) ... Refund - Unjust enrichment - the decision in the case of COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., CHANDIGARH Versus VARDHMAN INDUSTRIES LTD. [2005 (8) TMI 543 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI] contested, where it was held that the principles of unjust enrichment are not applicable against the same refund - Held that: - the decision in the above case upheld - appeal dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in the case with citation 2007 (11) TMI 598 - SC. Judges were S.H. Kapadia and B. Sudershan Reddy.