Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in the case with citation 2007 (11) TMI 598 - SC.</h1> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in the case with citation 2007 (11) TMI 598 - SC. - 2011 (267) E.L.T. A25 (SC) Refund - Unjust enrichment - the decision in the case of COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., CHANDIGARH Versus VARDHMAN INDUSTRIES LTD. [2005 (8) TMI 543 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI] contested, where it was held that the principles of unjust enrichment are not applicable against the same refund - Held that: - the decision in the above case upheld - appeal dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in the case with citation 2007 (11) TMI 598 - SC. Judges were S.H. Kapadia and B. Sudershan Reddy.