Delhi HC directs prompt decision on Customs Act representation, petitioner can seek court intervention if delayed. The Delhi HC disposed of a writ petition by Mr. Pradeep Jain, instructing it to be treated as a representation under Section 110A of the Customs Act. Mr. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Delhi HC directs prompt decision on Customs Act representation, petitioner can seek court intervention if delayed.
The Delhi HC disposed of a writ petition by Mr. Pradeep Jain, instructing it to be treated as a representation under Section 110A of the Customs Act. Mr. Satish Aggarwal was directed to decide promptly, with the petitioner having the option to approach the Court for undue delay.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by Mr. Pradeep Jain, Advocate, instructing that it be treated as a representation or application under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962. The respondent, Mr. Satish Aggarwal, Advocate, was directed to decide on the representation/application promptly, with the option for the petitioner to approach the Court in case of undue delay.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.