Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after an appeal under Section 188 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 and revision under Section 191, the civil courts retained jurisdiction to entertain a suit challenging the customs assessment and levy.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under the Sea Customs Act, 1878, as applied by Section 9 of the Land Customs Act, 1924, provided a self-contained machinery for assessment, appeal, revision and finality. The words "decision or order" in Section 188 were construed broadly enough to include a determination of the rate of duty applicable to the goods, not merely adjudications of confiscation, penalty or increased rate of duty under Section 182. The finality declared by Section 188, read with the revisional power in Section 191, was treated as excluding any further challenge in civil court where the statute created the liability and supplied its own exclusive remedy. The Court also relied on the earlier customs legislation to confirm that the appeal structure was intended to be comprehensive.
Conclusion: The civil court's jurisdiction was excluded, and the suit was barred after the statutory appeal and revision had been pursued.