Wholesale cash price governs customs valuation where ascertainable at importation; residuary valuation cannot replace the actual price.

Customs duty on imported motor cars was to be assessed under clause (a) of section 30 where a wholesale cash price less trade discount was ascertainable at the time and place of importation; clause (b) was only residuary and could not be used merely because the importer's pricing method or distribution system complicated valuation. The distributor price was treated as the relevant wholesale cash price because payment was made before delivery, the agreed discount was deducted, and the place of delivery satisfied the statutory requirement in a practical sense. Only the allowance for incomplete assembly was deductible; no further deduction for overhead or post-importation assembling expenses was permitted.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether customs duty on the imported motor cars was to be assessed under clause (a) of section 30 as a wholesale cash price less trade discount at the time and place of importation, or under clause (b) as a fallback where such price was not ascertainable; (ii) Whether the importer's price to its distributors could be treated as the relevant wholesale cash price notwithstanding the cars being sold through an organised distribution system and requiring minor post-arrival assembling work.

Issue (i): Whether customs duty on the imported motor cars was to be assessed under clause (a) of section 30 as a wholesale cash price less trade discount at the time and place of importation, or under clause (b) as a fallback where such price was not ascertainable.

Analysis: The governing test was the statutory definition of "real value", under which clause (a) applied whenever a wholesale cash price less trade discount was ascertainable at the time and place of importation. Clause (b) was only a residuary provision. The existence of an actual price meeting the statutory description did not require a hypothetical market with surplus goods or the presence of other identical goods for sale. The phrase "at the place of importation" was construed in a practical and reasonable sense, not as requiring an exact ex-ship or ex-wharf calculation.

Conclusion: The cars were assessable under clause (a), and clause (b) had no application.

Issue (ii): Whether the importer's price to its distributors could be treated as the relevant wholesale cash price notwithstanding the cars being sold through an organised distribution system and requiring minor post-arrival assembling work.

Analysis: The price charged to distributors was a wholesale cash price because payment was made before delivery and only the agreed discount had been deducted. The sales were at the time of importation in a reasonable legal sense, and the place of delivery in Bombay satisfied the statutory requirement of place of importation. The agreed allowance for incomplete assembly was properly deducted, but further deductions for overhead or post-importation assembling expenses were not warranted under the statute. The importer's monopoly position and business method did not exclude the application of clause (a) once a qualifying wholesale price was found.

Conclusion: The distributor price was the correct assessable wholesale cash price, and no further deduction for post-importation expenses was allowable.

Final Conclusion: The customs assessment made by the revenue authorities was upheld, and the importer was not entitled to recovery of the alleged overpaid duty.

Ratio Decidendi: Where imported goods are in fact sold at a wholesale cash price less trade discount at the time and place of importation, that actual price is the "real value" for customs assessment, and the residuary valuation provision cannot be invoked merely because the importer's pricing structure or post-importation activities affect the amount charged.

---