Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the watch components described as barrel axle screw, bridge screw, dial key screw and lid screw were classifiable as screws under Item 52 of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule or under the residuary Item 68.
Analysis: Item 52 specifically covered screws, and goods falling within a specific tariff item could not be pushed into the residuary entry merely because they were also component parts of watches. The articles had the appearance of screws, were described as screws by the manufacturers and in the relevant Indian Standards specification, and performed the function of holding together parts of the watch assembly. The distinction sought to be drawn on minute gaps or on whether the head or shank performed the fastening function was treated as an undue refinement. Since the tariff entry did not refer to end-use, the fact that the goods were used in watches did not exclude them from Item 52.
Conclusion: The articles were classifiable as screws under Item 52 and not under Item 68.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, the order of the Collector (Appeals) was set aside, and the classification adopted by the Assistant Collector was restored.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tariff entry specifically covers an article by name, it must be classified under that specific entry if it answers the common and trade understanding of that name, and it cannot be relegated to the residuary entry merely because of its end-use or because it forms part of a larger machine or instrument.