1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Stay granted against dues recovery pending appeal, criticizes Range Superintendent's actions. Delays due to court unavailability.</h1> The Tribunal granted a stay against recovery of dues until the stay petition is decided, criticizing the Range Superintendent's actions in issuing ... - Issues involved:Grant of interim orders during pendency of stay petition, recovery proceedings by Revenue, threatening letters from Range Superintendent, legal position on recovery during pendency of stay petition.Grant of Interim Orders:The appellant filed an appeal along with a stay petition against a Commissioner's order confirming a duty demand. The matter faced multiple adjournments due to unavailability of the court, leading to a final disposal date of 7-1-2014.Threatening Letters from Range Superintendent:The Range Superintendent directed the appellant to deposit duty and penalty within three days, despite the matter being listed for Tribunal hearing. Subsequent letters threatened coercive action if dues were not paid, disregarding the pendency of the appeal before CESTAT.Legal Position on Recovery during Pendency of Stay Petition:The Tribunal criticized the Range Superintendent's actions, citing that recovery should not occur during the stay petition's pendency before the Higher Appellate Forum. The Tribunal granted a stay against recovery of dues until the stay petition is decided, highlighting the inappropriateness of threatening letters to the appellant.