<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1556 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172101</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a stay against recovery of dues until the stay petition is decided, criticizing the Range Superintendent&#039;s actions in issuing threatening letters demanding payment despite the pendency of the appeal before the Higher Appellate Forum. The appellant&#039;s appeal against a duty demand confirmation faced delays due to court unavailability, ultimately being disposed of on 7-1-2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 19:29:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=392880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1556 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172101</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a stay against recovery of dues until the stay petition is decided, criticizing the Range Superintendent&#039;s actions in issuing threatening letters demanding payment despite the pendency of the appeal before the Higher Appellate Forum. The appellant&#039;s appeal against a duty demand confirmation faced delays due to court unavailability, ultimately being disposed of on 7-1-2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>