Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to monetary refund or compensation for the value of ten bags of supari detained in connection with a penalty order after the penalty had been set aside.
Analysis: The detention of the goods was accepted on the record and the earlier factual finding supporting unloading of the supari was not displaced. The penalty order under section 28A(4) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 had already been struck down in appeal, and the Tribunal had indicated that consequential relief could be pursued. As return of the goods was no longer feasible, the appropriate relief was to direct payment of the value of the detained supari on the basis of the prevailing price on the date of unloading, along with a modest amount towards interest and costs.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to refund of the value of the ten bags of supari, with Rs. 2,000 awarded towards interest and costs.