https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163497 Detention of ten bags of supari was accepted on the record, and the earlier factual finding supporting unloading of the goods remained undisturbed. The penalty order under section 28A(4) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 had already been set aside in appeal, and consequential relief was preserved. Because return of the detained goods was no longer feasible, the proper relief was monetary refund of their value, assessed by reference to the prevailing price on the date of unloading, together with a modest amount towards interest and costs. en-us Sat, 05 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:09:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163497 Detention of ten bags of supari was accepted on the record, and the earlier factual finding supporting unloading of the goods remained undisturbed. The penalty order under section 28A(4) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 had already been set aside in appeal, and consequential relief was preserved. Because return of the detained goods was no longer feasible, the proper relief was monetary refund of their value, assessed by reference to the prevailing price on the date of unloading, together with a modest amount towards interest and costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Sat, 05 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163497