Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 28-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, requiring carriage of a delivery note for specified goods in a goods vehicle or boat, is unconstitutional or arbitrary.
Analysis: The proviso applies only to specified commodities and serves the object of ensuring proper payment of tax and preventing evasion. The requirement to carry a delivery note is treated as a regulatory measure connected with the inspection of goods and the establishment of check posts, and is therefore not arbitrary. The contention that the goods were transferred otherwise than by sale did not undermine the validity of the provision, since a delivery note may relate to delivery of goods in transactions with or without a completed sale. The grievance that forms were not issued to the extent demanded was also not a ground to invalidate the section.
Conclusion: Section 28-A was held valid and the challenge was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The petitions failed, and the regulatory requirement for delivery notes in respect of specified goods was upheld as a legitimate anti-evasion measure.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory requirement incidental to the collection and enforcement of sales tax, designed to prevent evasion and assist inspection at check posts, is a reasonable and valid regulatory measure.