<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 514 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160722</link>
    <description>Section 28-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, requiring carriage of a delivery note for specified goods in a goods vehicle or boat, was upheld as a valid regulatory measure. The Court treated the requirement as incidental to tax collection and enforcement, aimed at preventing evasion and assisting inspection at check posts, and found it neither arbitrary nor unconstitutional. The fact that goods may have been transferred otherwise than by sale did not affect the provision&#039;s validity, because a delivery note may relate to movement of goods in sale and non-sale transactions alike. The complaint regarding non-issue of forms was also insufficient to invalidate the section.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 17:14:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=340448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 514 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160722</link>
      <description>Section 28-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, requiring carriage of a delivery note for specified goods in a goods vehicle or boat, was upheld as a valid regulatory measure. The Court treated the requirement as incidental to tax collection and enforcement, aimed at preventing evasion and assisting inspection at check posts, and found it neither arbitrary nor unconstitutional. The fact that goods may have been transferred otherwise than by sale did not affect the provision&#039;s validity, because a delivery note may relate to movement of goods in sale and non-sale transactions alike. The complaint regarding non-issue of forms was also insufficient to invalidate the section.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>