Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a transferee of property is protected from recovery of sales tax arrears when the transfer is for consideration and without notice of the statutory charge, so that the property cannot be proceeded against for sale recovery.
Analysis: The firm's tax arrears had created a charge on the defaulter's property under the sales tax provisions, but the property had been transferred before the recovery measures were pursued against the transferee. The governing principle applied was that a charge cannot be enforced against property in the hands of a transferee for consideration without notice unless the statute expressly provides otherwise. The Court followed the rule stated by the Supreme Court and held that the Tamil Nadu sales tax recovery scheme did not contain any express provision overriding the protection available under section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act. The Court also accepted the transferee's stand that there was no notice of the charge or arrears.
Conclusion: The transferee was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice, and the property could not be proceeded against for recovery of the sales tax arrears. The writ appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of an express statutory provision to the contrary, a charge for tax arrears cannot be enforced against property transferred for consideration to a bona fide purchaser without notice of the charge.