Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        VAT and Sales Tax

        2014 (9) TMI 176 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        First charge on transferred property defeats transferee protection, but only for tax dues already payable at transfer. Section 27(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act was treated as an express exception to the transferee's protection under Section 100 of the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            First charge on transferred property defeats transferee protection, but only for tax dues already payable at transfer.

                            Section 27(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act was treated as an express exception to the transferee's protection under Section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act: a transferee for value without notice could not resist the revenue's charge unless the defaulting dealer proved absence of intent to defraud revenue. The statutory charge, however, was confined to tax and other sums already payable on the date of transfer, so later-arising liabilities could not be enforced against the transferred property. Applying strict interpretation of fiscal statutes, ambiguity was resolved in favour of the assessee, limiting the revenue's recovery remedy to pre-transfer arrears.




                            Issues: (i) whether Section 27(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 excludes the protection ordinarily available to a transferee for consideration without notice under Section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882; (ii) whether the revenue could recover tax arrears that became payable after the transfer of the property; (iii) whether the construction of the taxing provision should, in case of ambiguity, favour the assessee.

                            Issue (i): whether Section 27(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 excludes the protection ordinarily available to a transferee for consideration without notice under Section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

                            Analysis: The statutory scheme creates a first charge on the dealer's property for tax and other sums payable. Section 27(1) was read as shifting the initial burden to the defaulting dealer to establish that the transfer was not with intent to defraud revenue. In that context, the provision was held to operate as an express exception to the general rule in Section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, so that a transferee cannot claim immunity merely by asserting purchase for value without notice unless the dealer discharges the statutory burden.

                            Conclusion: Section 27(1) does exclude the ordinary protection under Section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 unless the defaulting dealer proves absence of intent to defraud revenue.

                            Issue (ii): whether the revenue could recover tax arrears that became payable after the transfer of the property.

                            Analysis: The charge under Section 26 attaches to tax and other sums payable by the dealer, and the court held that the statutory charge cannot be extended to amounts that were not payable by the dealer on the date of transfer. The respondents were therefore not entitled to proceed against the transferred property for liabilities that arose only after the transfer.

                            Conclusion: Recovery from the transferred property was not permissible for tax dues arising after the date of transfer.

                            Issue (iii): whether the construction of the taxing provision should, in case of ambiguity, favour the assessee.

                            Analysis: Applying the settled rule of strict interpretation of fiscal statutes, the court held that where two reasonable constructions are possible, the one favourable to the taxpayer must be adopted. This principle reinforced the limited scope of recovery after transfer and prevented enlargement of the revenue's remedy by implication.

                            Conclusion: The interpretation favourable to the assessee was applied.

                            Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded to the extent that the revenue could proceed only for arrears due up to the date of transfer and not for later liabilities, while the transfer was otherwise treated as void against the unrecovered pre-transfer tax dues because the defaulting dealer failed to discharge the statutory burden.

                            Ratio Decidendi: A statutory provision creating a first charge and making a transfer void unless the dealer proves absence of intent to defraud revenue overrides the general protection available to a transferee without notice, but only to the extent of liabilities already chargeable at the date of transfer; ambiguous fiscal provisions must be construed in favour of the assessee.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found