Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a notice and consequential attachment issued for recovery of sales tax arrears from the property purchased by the petitioner could be enforced against a bona fide purchaser who acquired the property before any attachment or encumbrance was created.
Analysis: The petitioner purchased the property through registered sale deeds before the impugned attachment was made. The property was not under attachment on the dates of purchase, and the petitioner was treated as a bona fide purchaser for valuable consideration without notice of any charge. A later attachment cannot bind such a purchaser. The earlier decisions relied upon support the principle that, where there is no charge on the property and the purchaser had no notice of the arrears, the sales tax authorities cannot proceed against the property in the hands of the purchaser for the defaulter's liability.
Conclusion: The notice and the consequent attachment were unsustainable and could not be enforced against the petitioner.