Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the auction purchaser could be proceeded against for sales tax arrears of the defaulting dealer and whether the demand notice issued to him was sustainable.
Analysis: The property was sold by TIIC in public auction and the petitioner purchased it for valuable consideration. No charge over the property for the alleged sales tax arrears was shown to exist. The Court relied on the principle that, in the absence of a statutory charge and where the purchaser is bona fide and without notice, the property in the hands of the purchaser cannot be proceeded against for recovery of the dealer's tax arrears. On those facts, the impugned demand could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The notice was unsustainable and the petitioner was not liable to be proceeded against for the arrears of the defaulting dealer.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded, the impugned demand was quashed, and the Department was left at liberty to proceed only against the defaulting dealer.