Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revenue could direct creation of encumbrance over properties purchased by the petitioner prior to the assessment order against the dealer, where the properties had never been attached and the petitioner was a third-party purchaser.
Analysis: The properties had been purchased by the petitioner through sale deeds executed much before the assessment order fastening liability on the dealer. The petitioner was unconnected with the dealer, the properties were not shown to have been attached at any point of time, and they were free from encumbrance at the time of purchase. In these circumstances, the direction to create encumbrance for recovery of the dealer's tax dues against the petitioner's properties was unsustainable. The view was reinforced by prior decisions protecting bona fide purchasers for value without notice from enforcement of the defaulter's tax liability against the purchased property.
Conclusion: The impugned communication directing creation of encumbrance on the petitioner's properties was illegal and was set aside.