Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether property transferred by a dealer after assessment could be proceeded against under the Revenue Recovery Act for recovery of sales tax arrears due from the transferor.
Analysis: The arrears related to sales tax due from the transferor under the Madras General Sales Tax Act. Although that Act created a charge on the property of the dealer and provided for recovery of tax as arrears of land revenue, the petitioners were only subsequent transferees of immovable property and not transferees of the business. The Revenue Recovery Act authorises attachment and sale of the defaulter's land, and its extended provisions concerning a transferee apply only where the statute makes the transferee liable as a defaulter. The statutory scheme governing sales tax did not treat a transferee of the dealer's immovable property as a defaulter for the transferor's sales tax arrears. The provisions applicable to land revenue and the certificate procedure under the Revenue Recovery Act did not justify proceeding against the petitioners' property on these facts.
Conclusion: The property of the petitioners could not be proceeded against under the Revenue Recovery Act for recovery of the sales tax arrears due from the transferor, and the writ petition succeeded.