Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the bar under section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 prohibits action under section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 for taking over management or possession and enforcing recovery against a company in respect of which proceedings under the 1985 Act are pending.
Analysis: The two enactments were held to be special statutes operating in different fields, but the 1985 Act was held to govern the situation once an industrial company is under inquiry, scheme consideration, or appeal under sections 16, 17 and 25. The expression "proceedings" in section 22(1) was construed broadly in light of the object of the legislation, so as to cover coercive measures analogous to execution or distress. Action under section 29 of the 1951 Act, though initiated by the Corporation itself and not through a court, was treated as a coercive recovery measure that would defeat the revival process if permitted during the pendency of proceedings under the 1985 Act.
Conclusion: Section 22(1) bars recourse to section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 during the pendency of proceedings under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 unless the consent of the Board or Appellate Authority is obtained, and the appellant succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: The term "proceedings" in section 22(1) of the 1985 Act includes coercive recovery action by a financial corporation under section 29 of the 1951 Act, because the revival-oriented scheme of the 1985 Act requires such actions to remain frozen until the competent authority permits them.