Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 22 of the Sick Industrial Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 barred proceedings under section 58A(9) of the Companies Act, 1956 for repayment of matured deposits to depositors.
Analysis: Section 22 suspends specified proceedings against a sick industrial company during pendency of inquiry or sanctioned proceedings, but the bar is not to be extended beyond its language. A claim by depositors for return of matured deposits is not in the nature of a suit for recovery of money in the sense contemplated by section 22, because deposits are sums kept with the company for return on maturity and do not amount to ordinary loans. The earlier Division Bench decision on an identical question was applied, and the defence based on section 22 was rejected.
Conclusion: Section 22 did not bar the depositors' applications under section 58A(9), and the direction for repayment with interest was sustained against the appellant.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the repayment order in favour of the depositors remained in force, with the amounts to be settled within the time fixed and interest payable for delay.
Ratio Decidendi: The statutory suspension under section 22 of the Sick Industrial Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 does not extend to a depositors' claim for return of matured deposits under section 58A(9) of the Companies Act, 1956, since such a claim is not a suit for recovery of money within the meaning of the bar.