Sick company protection under section 22 applies only to liabilities shown in the revival scheme, not to every suit or execution claim.

Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was treated as applying only where the liability in question was shown to be covered by, or reflected in, the revival scheme before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction. Mere pendency of sickness proceedings was held insufficient to bar a suit or justify rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. The same principle was extended to execution: after a decree, enforcement steps could not claim statutory protection unless the decretal debt was shown to fall within the sanctioned scheme or other statutory cover, and consent from the Board or Appellate Authority was the proper course where protection was sought.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the pendency of proceedings under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 barred the suit and justified rejection of the plaint under Order VII, Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. (ii) Whether, after a decree had been passed, the execution proceedings were protected by section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 when the decretal claim was not shown in the scheme before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction.

Issue (i): Whether the pendency of proceedings under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 barred the suit and justified rejection of the plaint under Order VII, Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Analysis: Protection under section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was held to depend on the company showing that the claim in question was covered by or reflected in the scheme placed before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction. Mere invocation of the statute or pendency of proceedings was insufficient. The debtor was required to comply with directions, establish the applicability of the statutory protection, and disclose that the debt claimed in the suit had been admitted or included in the revival scheme. In the absence of such showing, the plaint could not be rejected on the basis urged.

Conclusion: The plea that section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 compelled rejection of the plaint was rejected and the suit was held maintainable.

Issue (ii): Whether, after a decree had been passed, the execution proceedings were protected by section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 when the decretal claim was not shown in the scheme before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction.

Analysis: Once a claim stood adjudicated and reduced into a decree, further steps to enforce it were treated as proceedings in the nature of execution, distress or the like. The protective bar under section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was read as extending to enforcement measures where the liability was covered by the sanctioned scheme or was otherwise shown to fall within the statutory protection. If unique circumstances justified execution despite sickness proceedings, the proper course was to seek consent from the Board or the Appellate Authority. On the facts, the decretal amount was not shown to be included in the scheme, but the appellant still failed to establish any entitlement to protection.

Conclusion: The execution proceedings were not shown to be immune from continuation, and the challenge to them failed.

Final Conclusion: The statutory protection for a sick company was confined to liabilities legitimately covered by the revival scheme or by the execution bar contemplated by the Act, and it could not be used to defeat adjudication or enforcement where the claimed debt was not established to fall within that protection.

Ratio Decidendi: Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 protects only those proceedings for recovery or execution that are shown to relate to liabilities covered by, or contemplated in, the sanctioned scheme or other statutory protection under the Act.

---