Priority of secured creditor over money-laundering attachment upheld for prior mortgage against alleged proceeds of crime.

A bona fide secured creditor with a prior mortgage was held to have statutory priority over a later provisional attachment under the money-laundering law. The Tribunal found that the bank's security interest predated the alleged laundering activity, that the bank had no nexus to the predicate offence, and that property lawfully acquired and mortgaged before the alleged crime could not be treated as proceeds of crime against that creditor. The attachment was therefore set aside to the extent of the bank's secured interest, while proceedings against the borrowers continued.

---

---

Issues: Whether the secured creditor bank was entitled to priority over the Enforcement Directorate's provisional attachment of mortgaged properties, and whether the attached properties could be treated as proceeds of crime so as to sustain confirmation of attachment.

Analysis: The bank's security interest was created prior to the alleged laundering activity, and the bank was found to be an innocent secured creditor with no nexus to the predicate offence. The amended provisions granting priority to secured creditors under the securitisation and debt recovery laws were treated as later special enactments having overriding effect over the general non obstante clause in the money-laundering law. The Tribunal also relied on the principle that property bona fide acquired and mortgaged before the alleged crime cannot be treated as proceeds of crime merely because the borrower is alleged to have committed offences. On that basis, the provisional attachment could not be sustained against the bank's secured interest.

Conclusion: The attachment could not prevail against the bank's secured and prior mortgage interest, and the mortgaged properties were liable to be released insofar as the bank was concerned.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the provisional attachment was set aside to the extent of the bank's mortgaged security, while the proceedings against the borrowers were left to continue in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: A bona fide secured creditor with a prior security interest enjoys statutory priority over subsequent attachment under the money-laundering law, and property not shown to be proceeds of crime cannot be confirmed as attached against that creditor.

---