Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, while a sanctioned rehabilitation scheme under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was under implementation, the sales tax authorities could continue or initiate coercive recovery proceedings under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 without the consent of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction.
Analysis: Section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 operates notwithstanding anything contained in any other law and suspends proceedings for execution, distress or the like against the properties of a sick industrial company when a sanctioned scheme is under implementation. The provision is intended to protect the revival process and prevents coercive recovery measures unless the Board or appellate authority grants consent. Section 19 deals with reliefs, concessions, sacrifices, or deferred tax treatment that may be incorporated in a rehabilitation scheme with consent of the concerned Government, but that does not dilute the independent embargo created by section 22(1) against coercive recovery. Recovery action under section 17 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 is a coercive step within the reach of section 22(1).
Conclusion: The sales tax recovery proceedings could not be pursued without the consent of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, and the objection to coercive recovery succeeded.