Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal, while exercising revisional jurisdiction, was justified in setting aside the penalty imposed under section 36(3)(a) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, read with section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and in holding that there was reasonable cause for non-payment of tax.
Analysis: The Tribunal found that the C forms produced by the assessee were not bogus or fabricated and had in fact been issued by the Bombay sales tax authorities. It further found that the purchasing dealers were genuine dealers, though one registration had been cancelled and the other dealer had closed business, and therefore the assessee could not have known that the forms supplied to him were unauthorised or unusable. These circumstances were treated as constituting reasonable cause for the assessee's default. In revisional jurisdiction, the Tribunal was competent to sustain part of the order, remit the assessment aspect, and delete the penalty where the factual findings justified that course.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty, and the question was correctly answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by upholding the Tribunal's view that penalty was not warranted on the facts found, and the assessee succeeded on the penalty issue.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty for tax default is not justified where the factual findings show bona fide conduct and reasonable cause, and a revisional authority may delete such penalty on the basis of those findings even while remanding the assessment matter.