Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether additional payment made pursuant to a settlement under the Industrial Disputes Act, over and above the statutory bonus ceiling, was allowable as a deduction under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The payment arose from a binding settlement under section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act and was made for business considerations to secure industrial peace and better productivity. The liability was not confined to bonus under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, but represented an enforceable commercial obligation undertaken in the course of business. Since the expenditure was laid out on grounds of commercial expediency and did not fall within the restricted category of bonus governed by section 36(1)(ii), it was deductible as a business expenditure.
Conclusion: The additional payment was allowable under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the answer to the referred question was in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's view was set aside and the assessee's claim for deduction of the settlement-linked additional payment was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment made under a binding labour settlement for commercial expediency and business necessity is deductible under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, when it is not a bonus payment governed by section 36(1)(ii).