Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2006 (6) TMI 419 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds Bad Debt Deductions, Allows Entertainment Expenses The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeals for the assessment years 1977-78, 1979-80, and 1980-81, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions to allow bad debt ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Tribunal Upholds Bad Debt Deductions, Allows Entertainment Expenses

                            The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeals for the assessment years 1977-78, 1979-80, and 1980-81, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions to allow bad debt deductions. It also partly allowed the assessee's appeal for the assessment year 1983-84, permitting deductions for bad debts, entertainment expenses, and bonus paid to staff.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Deduction of bad debts for assessment years 1977-78, 1979-80, and 1980-81.
                            2. Deduction of bad debts for assessment year 1983-84.
                            3. Disallowance of entertainment expenses for assessment year 1983-84.
                            4. Disallowance of bonus paid to staff for assessment year 1983-84.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Deduction of Bad Debts for Assessment Years 1977-78, 1979-80, and 1980-81:

                            The revenue contested the CIT(A)'s decision to allow deductions for bad debts amounting to Rs. 9,19,339, Rs. 12,68,576, and Rs. 9,90,000 for the respective assessment years. The assessee, a banking company, claimed these bad debts in its returns, which the Assessing Officer (AO) initially disallowed on the grounds that the debts had not been established as bad. Upon appeal, the CIT(A) allowed the deductions, prompting the revenue's appeal to the Tribunal.

                            The Tribunal noted that the AO had previously been directed to examine each bad debt item, but the assessee could not provide detailed information due to the age of the debts. The AO observed that legal actions were taken in most cases, but the debts were not written off correctly in the books, thus disallowing the claims again.

                            The CIT(A) allowed the claims, stating that the assessee had taken all necessary steps to recover the debts and that the mere possession of a decree did not convert a bad debt into a good one. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that the assessee fulfilled all conditions for claiming bad debts under section 36(1)(vii), and the revenue's objections were without merit.

                            2. Deduction of Bad Debts for Assessment Year 1983-84:

                            The assessee claimed a deduction of bad debts amounting to Rs. 64,95,154, which the AO disallowed, arguing that the debts were not written off correctly and the assessee failed to provide complete information. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, leading to the assessee's appeal.

                            The Tribunal found that the facts of this case were similar to the earlier assessment years. The assessee had provided detailed information about the debts, including the reasons for non-recovery and legal actions taken. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had fulfilled the conditions for claiming bad debts and set aside the CIT(A)'s order, allowing the deduction.

                            3. Disallowance of Entertainment Expenses for Assessment Year 1983-84:

                            The AO disallowed entertainment expenses amounting to Rs. 6,64,872, allowing only Rs. 30,000 under section 37(2A). The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance based on the previous year's order. The assessee appealed, arguing that similar expenses had been allowed in previous years.

                            The Tribunal referred to its earlier orders and allowed a deduction of Rs. 2,30,049, including expenses on employees, inauguration, and annual general meetings, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order.

                            4. Disallowance of Bonus Paid to Staff for Assessment Year 1983-84:

                            The AO disallowed Rs. 50,773 of the claimed Rs. 17,98,000 in bonus, stating it exceeded the statutory limit. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance. The assessee appealed, citing a previous Tribunal order allowing such expenses on grounds of commercial expediency.

                            The Tribunal, following its earlier decision, allowed the bonus as a deductible expense, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeals for the assessment years 1977-78, 1979-80, and 1980-81, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions to allow bad debt deductions. It also partly allowed the assessee's appeal for the assessment year 1983-84, permitting deductions for bad debts, entertainment expenses, and bonus paid to staff.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found