<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15636</link>
    <description>An additional payment made under a binding settlement under the Industrial Disputes Act was treated as deductible business expenditure under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, because it was incurred for commercial expediency to secure industrial peace and productivity. The payment was not confined to bonus under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, and therefore did not fall within the restricted bonus category under section 36(1)(ii). As an enforceable commercial obligation undertaken in the course of business, the settlement-linked payment was allowable as a deduction, and the assessee&#039;s claim was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:38:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15636</link>
      <description>An additional payment made under a binding settlement under the Industrial Disputes Act was treated as deductible business expenditure under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, because it was incurred for commercial expediency to secure industrial peace and productivity. The payment was not confined to bonus under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, and therefore did not fall within the restricted bonus category under section 36(1)(ii). As an enforceable commercial obligation undertaken in the course of business, the settlement-linked payment was allowable as a deduction, and the assessee&#039;s claim was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>