Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether incentive payment made under a settlement with workers, over and above statutory bonus, was allowable as business expenditure under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The payment was made pursuant to a settlement under section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and the memorandum showed that the additional amount was agreed to for better performance and smooth working of the mills. The payment was found to be made on commercial considerations to avoid strike action and disruption of business. Once the amount was held not to be bonus, section 36(1)(ii) had no application, and the allowability of the expenditure had to be tested under section 37. On those facts, the expenditure was treated as laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business. The decision followed the principle that incentive or similar payments made for business expediency are deductible under section 37.
Conclusion: The payment was allowable under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and not governed by section 36(1)(ii); the question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment made under a workers' settlement for commercial expediency and for the smooth running of business, when not constituting statutory bonus, is deductible as business expenditure under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.