Appeal Dismissed for Non-Compliance with Stay Order Conditions The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata due to the appellant's failure to comply with the Stay Order conditions, which mandated ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal Dismissed for Non-Compliance with Stay Order Conditions
The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata due to the appellant's failure to comply with the Stay Order conditions, which mandated a pre-deposit of Rs. 1,50,000. Despite initially depositing the amount, the appellant subsequently transferred it to their P.L.A., resulting in the dismissal of the appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata dismissed an appeal due to non-compliance with the conditions of a Stay Order that required a pre-deposit of Rs. 1,50,000. The appellant had deposited the amount but later credited it to their P.L.A., leading to the dismissal of the appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.