<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 851 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126708</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata due to the appellant&#039;s failure to comply with the Stay Order conditions, which mandated a pre-deposit of Rs. 1,50,000. Despite initially depositing the amount, the appellant subsequently transferred it to their P.L.A., resulting in the dismissal of the appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 851 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126708</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata due to the appellant&#039;s failure to comply with the Stay Order conditions, which mandated a pre-deposit of Rs. 1,50,000. Despite initially depositing the amount, the appellant subsequently transferred it to their P.L.A., resulting in the dismissal of the appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>