Maintainability of appeal fails where the appellant accepted the original order and had no grievance against the appellate decision.

Appeals before the Tribunal were held not maintainable because the appellants had accepted the original penalty order, had not challenged that adjudication before the Commissioner (Appeals), and therefore were not aggrieved by the appellate order passed in the Revenue's appeal. A party cannot raise a maintainable grievance before the Tribunal against an order when it did not contest the original order and suffered no adverse prejudice from the later appellate decision. The appeals were dismissed, and the stay applications were disposed of accordingly.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeals were maintainable when the appellants had not challenged the original adjudication order before the Commissioner (Appeals) and were not aggrieved by that order.

Analysis: The appellants had accepted the penalty imposed by the original authority and had not appealed against that adjudication before the Commissioner (Appeals). In the Revenue's appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the adjudication order. As the appellants were not aggrieved by the original order, they had no maintainable grievance to raise before the Tribunal against the appellate order.

Conclusion: The appeals were not maintainable and were dismissed along with the stay applications.

---