<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 734 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126056</link>
    <description>Appeals before the Tribunal were held not maintainable because the appellants had accepted the original penalty order, had not challenged that adjudication before the Commissioner (Appeals), and therefore were not aggrieved by the appellate order passed in the Revenue&#039;s appeal. A party cannot raise a maintainable grievance before the Tribunal against an order when it did not contest the original order and suffered no adverse prejudice from the later appellate decision. The appeals were dismissed, and the stay applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:31:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 734 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126056</link>
      <description>Appeals before the Tribunal were held not maintainable because the appellants had accepted the original penalty order, had not challenged that adjudication before the Commissioner (Appeals), and therefore were not aggrieved by the appellate order passed in the Revenue&#039;s appeal. A party cannot raise a maintainable grievance before the Tribunal against an order when it did not contest the original order and suffered no adverse prejudice from the later appellate decision. The appeals were dismissed, and the stay applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>