Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to small scale industry exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. for the relevant years, and whether the finding recorded in the earlier remand order that the clearances for 1987-88 had not exceeded Rs. 7.5 lakhs bound the authorities in the subsequent proceedings.
Analysis: The earlier remand order had recorded a categorical finding that the assessee's clearances for 1987-88 had not exceeded Rs. 7.5 lakhs. That finding was not challenged by the Revenue and, as the final fact-finding determination on the point, it could not be reopened in de novo adjudication. On that basis, the assessee satisfied the first condition for SSI benefit for 1987-88 and thereby also fulfilled one of the conditions for the next year. The Revenue did not dispute that the remaining turnover conditions for 1988-89 were met.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to SSI exemption for both years, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The denial of exemption was set aside in substance, and the assessee's entitlement to the benefit under the notification stood confirmed.