<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 743 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124930</link>
    <description>The assessee&#039;s entitlement to small scale industry exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. turned on an earlier remand finding that clearances for 1987-88 had not exceeded Rs. 7.5 lakhs. That finding was categorical, was not challenged by the Revenue, and operated as the final fact-finding determination, so it could not be reopened in de novo adjudication. On that basis, the assessee satisfied the first condition for SSI benefit for 1987-88 and thereby also the corresponding requirement for 1988-89. As the Revenue did not dispute the remaining turnover conditions for 1988-89, the exemption was available for both years and the denial of benefit failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:25:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 743 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124930</link>
      <description>The assessee&#039;s entitlement to small scale industry exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. turned on an earlier remand finding that clearances for 1987-88 had not exceeded Rs. 7.5 lakhs. That finding was categorical, was not challenged by the Revenue, and operated as the final fact-finding determination, so it could not be reopened in de novo adjudication. On that basis, the assessee satisfied the first condition for SSI benefit for 1987-88 and thereby also the corresponding requirement for 1988-89. As the Revenue did not dispute the remaining turnover conditions for 1988-89, the exemption was available for both years and the denial of benefit failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>