Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported polyester fabric could be reclassified on the basis of the departmental test report when the prescribed testing protocol under the HSN Explanatory Notes and accepted textile testing standards was not followed.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the reliability of the departmental laboratory report that treated the fabric as composed of textured filament yarn. The test examiner admitted in cross-examination that the examination was visual and microscopic, and that the standard method for determining textured nature of filament yarn under the accepted textile testing regime had not been followed. The prescribed conditioning and testing protocol under the HSN Explanatory Notes, as well as the relevant standard methods for testing textiles, required proper conditioning and testing in a controlled atmosphere, with apparatus suitable for determining crimp and related characteristics. Since the departmental report did not conform to those protocols, the material basis for reclassification could not be accepted.
Conclusion: The reclassification based on the departmental test report was unsustainable and was set aside in favour of the importer.
Final Conclusion: The importers succeeded on the core classification dispute, and the connected revenue challenge for redemption fine did not survive.