<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 451 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124479</link>
    <description>Reclassification of imported polyester fabric based on a departmental test report was unsustainable because the laboratory did not follow the prescribed HSN Explanatory Notes protocol or accepted textile testing standards. The examiner admitted that the assessment was only visual and microscopic, without the required conditioning, controlled testing, or proper apparatus to determine the textured nature of filament yarn. As the report did not provide a reliable basis for classification, the proposed reclassification was set aside in favour of the importer, and the connected revenue challenge to redemption fine did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:47:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 451 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124479</link>
      <description>Reclassification of imported polyester fabric based on a departmental test report was unsustainable because the laboratory did not follow the prescribed HSN Explanatory Notes protocol or accepted textile testing standards. The examiner admitted that the assessment was only visual and microscopic, without the required conditioning, controlled testing, or proper apparatus to determine the textured nature of filament yarn. As the report did not provide a reliable basis for classification, the proposed reclassification was set aside in favour of the importer, and the connected revenue challenge to redemption fine did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>