Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of Central Excise assesses, waives pre-deposit and stays recovery The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata found the denial of the benefit of Notification No. 108/95 to Central Excise assesses due to a discrepancy in the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of Central Excise assesses, waives pre-deposit and stays recovery
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata found the denial of the benefit of Notification No. 108/95 to Central Excise assesses due to a discrepancy in the certificate signer's title to be prima facie incorrect. The Tribunal ordered a full waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F and stayed recovery for the appeal hearing, disposing of the application accordingly.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata heard a case where the benefit of Notification No. 108/95 was denied to Central Excise assesses due to a discrepancy in the certificate signer's title. The Tribunal found the denial prima facie incorrect and ordered a full waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F, staying recovery for the appeal hearing. Application disposed of accordingly.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.