<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 393 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119703</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata found the denial of the benefit of Notification No. 108/95 to Central Excise assesses due to a discrepancy in the certificate signer&#039;s title to be prima facie incorrect. The Tribunal ordered a full waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F and stayed recovery for the appeal hearing, disposing of the application accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:11:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 393 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119703</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata found the denial of the benefit of Notification No. 108/95 to Central Excise assesses due to a discrepancy in the certificate signer&#039;s title to be prima facie incorrect. The Tribunal ordered a full waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F and stayed recovery for the appeal hearing, disposing of the application accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>