Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery should be granted in respect of the duty demand raised on used moulds under Rule 3(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001.
Analysis: The order records that the demand was based on the removal of moulds during the relevant period. The appellant contended that used capital goods were not removed "as such" within the meaning of the rule, and reliance was placed on a Tribunal decision supporting that view. The order also notes that a part of the demand had already been paid and that the appellant had a prima facie case.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted for the balance demand.