Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether polypropylene twines manufactured from polypropylene granules were classifiable under Heading 56.07 as twine or under Heading 39.26 as plastic articles.
Analysis: Heading 56.07 applies to twine, cordage, ropes and cables falling in Section XI of the tariff, which deals with textiles and textile articles. The product in question was manufactured from polypropylene granules, which are plastic raw material, and there was no material to show that it contained textile yarn or was made of textile material. The classification principle of choosing the most specific description did not assist the Revenue because Heading 56.07 covers only twines of textile character, whereas a product made from polypropylene granules remains a plastic product under Chapter 39.
Conclusion: The product was correctly classifiable under Heading 39.26 and not under Heading 56.07; the Revenue's appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: Classification depended on the nature of the material and the product could not be treated as twine under Section XI unless it was made of textile material.
Ratio Decidendi: Twine falls under Heading 56.07 only when it is made of textile material; a product made of polypropylene granules, without evidence of textile yarn, is classifiable as a plastic article under Chapter 39.