<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 523 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115098</link>
    <description>Polypropylene twines manufactured from polypropylene granules were held classifiable under Heading 39.26 as plastic articles, not under Heading 56.07 as twine. Heading 56.07 applies to twine, cordage, ropes and cables of textile character in Section XI, and the absence of any material showing textile yarn or textile material was decisive. The principle of the most specific description did not aid classification under Heading 56.07 because that heading is confined to textile twines. Classification therefore depended on the material composition of the product, and a polypropylene article could not be treated as twine under Section XI.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:24:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 523 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115098</link>
      <description>Polypropylene twines manufactured from polypropylene granules were held classifiable under Heading 39.26 as plastic articles, not under Heading 56.07 as twine. Heading 56.07 applies to twine, cordage, ropes and cables of textile character in Section XI, and the absence of any material showing textile yarn or textile material was decisive. The principle of the most specific description did not aid classification under Heading 56.07 because that heading is confined to textile twines. Classification therefore depended on the material composition of the product, and a polypropylene article could not be treated as twine under Section XI.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>