TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a stay petition filed after expiry of 180 days from the stay order was maintainable, and whether it could be treated as a fresh application under Section 35F.
Analysis: The application for extension of stay was filed beyond the period of 180 days from the stay order. In view of Rule 28A of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, the request could not be entertained as a fresh application under Section 35F.
Conclusion: The application for extension of stay was not maintainable and the request to treat it as a fresh application was rejected.
TaxTMI 
