https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114415 A stay-extension application filed after the expiry of 180 days from the original stay order was held not maintainable. Applying Rule 28A of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, the request could not be entertained as a fresh application under Section 35F. The operative effect is that a belated request for extension of stay does not revive the application by recasting it as a new statutory stay request. en-us Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 May 2012 14:51:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114415 A stay-extension application filed after the expiry of 180 days from the original stay order was held not maintainable. Applying Rule 28A of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, the request could not be entertained as a fresh application under Section 35F. The operative effect is that a belated request for extension of stay does not revive the application by recasting it as a new statutory stay request. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114415