Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of duty demanded on printed/unprinted laminated plastic films, in the context of eligibility to exemption under Notification No. 14/92-C.E. dated 1-3-92.
Analysis: The application turned on whether bare duty-paid plastic films used as inputs could be regarded as plastic materials falling under Chapters 39.01 to 39.15 for the purpose of the exemption notification. The Board's circulars dated 25-6-1987 and 22-8-1990 were relied upon as clarifying that lacquered, laminated or metallised films manufactured from duty-paid bare plastic films could still be treated as products made out of duty-paid plastic materials falling under Heading Nos. 39.01 to 39.15, provided the input material satisfied that description. In view of that clarification and the applicants' contention regarding the classification of the plastic material used, a prima facie case was made out.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was dispensed with and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.