<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 382 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111873</link>
    <description>Printed or laminated plastic films were considered in the context of exemption under Notification No. 14/92-C.E., with the key question being whether duty-paid bare plastic films used as inputs could qualify as plastic materials falling under Chapters 39.01 to 39.15. Relying on Board circulars dated 25-6-1987 and 22-8-1990, the analysis treated lacquered, laminated or metallised films made from duty-paid bare plastic films as products made out of duty-paid plastic materials, where the input satisfied the tariff description. On that basis, a prima facie case was found and pre-deposit of duty and penalty was dispensed with, with recovery stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:31:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 382 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111873</link>
      <description>Printed or laminated plastic films were considered in the context of exemption under Notification No. 14/92-C.E., with the key question being whether duty-paid bare plastic films used as inputs could qualify as plastic materials falling under Chapters 39.01 to 39.15. Relying on Board circulars dated 25-6-1987 and 22-8-1990, the analysis treated lacquered, laminated or metallised films made from duty-paid bare plastic films as products made out of duty-paid plastic materials, where the input satisfied the tariff description. On that basis, a prima facie case was found and pre-deposit of duty and penalty was dispensed with, with recovery stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>