Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed for wrongful availment of credit on inputs used in the manufacture of exempted final products was liable to be sustained in full or reduced in view of the payment made before issuance of the show cause notice.
Analysis: The appeal did not dispute the reversal of credit, as the inputs had admittedly been used in the manufacture of exempted final products. The only surviving controversy concerned the penalty. Taking note of the fact that the duty amount had been deposited before issuance of the show cause notice, the Tribunal considered that imposition of a penalty equal to the duty amount was not warranted on the facts.
Conclusion: The reversal of Cenvat credit was confirmed, but the penalty was reduced from Rs. 49,26,266 to Rs. 1 lakh.